Key Concepts
The Surgeon's Attitude
Your "Supercharity"
Path Management
Want Management
The Eight Lane Highway
Two Tables, the Golden Rule 2.0,
and about making changes in systems.
The Sakai (also
called The Sakai Vision)
World Peace One and World Peace One's
global strategy to attain the Sakai.
"Hold the Pattern Together"
"Make a friend. Be a
friend. Lift a friend higher"
"You do the quality control"
The Surgeon's Attitude
The Surgeon's Attitude is to have the seriousness and focus
of doctors surgeons who know that lives depend on the quality of
their
work. There are five parts of the attitude:
a. Commitment to the best methods. A surgeon would never be
considered competent if he or she used less than the best
methods. We are a group that aims to live this spirit for the
benefit of all: ourselves, our loved ones, and the whole
world.
b. Passion. Good doctors are not totally detached and cold.
The spirit of the surgeon's attitude is to "act as if your
child's life was on the line, and not someone else's.
-- Your
Molly, your Jason, your Kizito, your Prajhi, your Ling. Act as
if you can see their faces."
c. Reasonable stretches. We make reasonable stretches, not
"kamikaze" stretches. "Make reasonable
stretches" is a useful slogan to bear in mind. Do your
level best.
d. Conscious effort. We ask for conscious effort for five
hours per week, but we hope that the spirit of doing the best,
most loving things pervades the rest of your life.
e. Commitment to ongoing learning. Just as doctors must keep
up to date and learning, we need to keep learning because our world
and our personal situation keeps changing.
"Your Supercharity"
People give to charities for many reasons, but not all of them
are good reasons. Some people give because a friend
asks, and they don't want to look bad. Some people give
because the charity offers some benefit in return. Some
give because a charity has spent money to create a good image
through impressive PR
-- whether or not the charity is
effective.
To increase the good that people do through charity, we
decided to create a new term, "supercharity."
Your supercharity is the organization (or group of organizations) that
best address the problems that you would not want to
personally suffer. For instance, if someone thought
that the worst thing was political torture, then giving to
organizations that efficiently address political torture would
be supercharity for them. But if another person thought
that sexual molestation was the worst thing that they could
imagine, then giving to organizations that prevented or
minimized that problem would be supercharity for them.
Your supercharity (or supercharities) depend on you and your
values.
In any case, you don't have to limit your supercharity to one
issue or problem. There's no need to try to figure out
what is the worst of many awful forms of suffering. By
defining this new term, "supercharity," we are trying to encourage people to
donate more money and time to their supercharities, and less to other, less
critical charities. When most people do this, you can
expect the amount of suffering in the world to be much less.
Along with donating to your supercharities, you should not
forget to support "behind the scenes" organizations
that attack some of the problems behind the problems.
For instance, no one dies directly from being illiterate or
uneducated. But certain kinds of education empower people to avoid
problems and situations that cause suffering and
death.
Path Management
Path Management is related to the Surgeon's Attitude. Path
Management is to periodically ask yourself the question
"What is the best, most loving use of my time, right
now?"
-- and answer the question with action. [Those doing an Internet search will
find an analytical
tool called "Path Management" that is something
completely different.] More.
Want Management
Want Management is an approach to time management that is
involves managing your wants. It is also related to the
surgeon's attitude. Here's a brief introduction:
Everything you do can be divided into three categories: things
you need to do (to survive); things you want to do (but don't
need to do); and things that you don't want and don't need to
do, but do anyway. This third category includes duties,
addictions, and things that other people sometimes get you to
do. (Note that some duties are things that somebody needs to
do if we are to survive, but other duties are just social
duties.)
All of our wants can be divided into "really-wants"
and "it-would-be-nice-ifs," Really-wants are desires
closely connected with our personal mission or the missions
those we love. It-would-be-nice-ifs are the things that we
could live without but find ourselves seeking, such as the
latest product or movie. It-would-be-nice-ifs aren't always
bad. It's only when they clutter our lifestyles and interfere
with us getting our needs and our really-wants met that they
cause problems. Weeding out it-would-be-nice-ifs is a good way
to have less stress and more capacity.
It also pays to realize that some of our
"really-wants" are actually symbols of what we
really want, and not the reality itself. For instance, if you
say you really want a big house or a lot of property, maybe
you really want the security these represent. Or the money or
power that some people want is just a means to get the
recognition, acceptance or attention from others that they
deep-down really want. People can waste large parts of their
lives working for these symbols and end up feeling empty. So
ask yourself if some of the things you are working for can be
gotten more directly in other ways. For example, if you
realize that for you a big house represents emotional
security, instead of spending years paying for a large house,
you might form the personal relationships that give you the
emotional security that you really want. More.
The Eight Lane Highway
The Eight-Lane Highway is a concept developed by Tim
Cimino, based on some words of Martin Luther King about a
two-lane highway approach to promote civil rights. Each of the
eight lanes has a simple, easy level, and a more powerful
level. Together, the eight lanes form an integrated strategy.
Part of the strategy is to anchor yourself with the first lane
first, so that you have created expectation and momentum to
take action. Then, as needed, focus on the second lane next,
so that you will have sufficient time, money and skill to
eventually work on all of the remaining six lanes. The second
lane should be a constant focus because without it, your
ability to do good will be limited.
Lane 1. Easier level: have an ongoing personal support system (buddy or
small group.)
More powerful level: have all of the necessary ingredients of a learning
environment.
Lane 2. Easier level: build up time, money, energy or skill.
More powerful level: work on getting whichever resource or ingredient of
change is most needed by you, whether it is time, money, a
certain skill, encouragement, feedback, expert knowledge, or
any other ingredient or resource.
Lane 3. Easier level: spend an hour on personal fulfillment, whatever
makes you feel most alive?
More powerful level: work toward your deepest sense of fulfillment. Thus the
hour may not be the most pleasurable if you are doing things
like planning or envisioning.
Lane 4. Easier level: do charity with your time and money, focusing on
the problems that you would most hate to experience yourself.
More powerful level: do research to support the most strategic charities, and
also learn how you can help them to be more effective.
Lane 5. Easier level: be politically active, by informing yourself about
current issues and by making your voice heard.
More powerful level: increase your ability to think critically and analyze
issues, and learn how to do the most strategic political
actions, ones that make systemic changes.
Lane 6. Easier level: make your lifestyle more
environmental.
More powerful level: learn about the most strategic environmental actions,
and do them
Lane 7. Easier level: be active economically (this means influencing the
economy through things like socially responsible investments
and by understanding the political and economic impact of your
spending and saving habits.)
More powerful level: learn about the most strategic economic actions, and do
them.
Lane 8. Easier level: empower others through personal contact, whether
informally or through volunteer contacts.
More powerful level: teach and support someone to be a member of Fellowship
of the Dream, so that they will have access to the support and
resources, and later pass them on.
The Two Tables, the Golden Rule 2.0, and about making changes
in systems.
a. The Two Tables model of your life-support systems.
If you imagine that all your goals and dreams for this
life are in a box, the box rests on a table whose four legs
are the stability of your health, mental health, key personal
relationships, and ethical/spiritual integrity. If even one of
these legs is compromised, your goals and dreams
-- and maybe
your life
-- are in trouble. Most people recognize the importance
of maintaining these four legs. But this table is on another,
much larger, table whose four legs are the stability of the
environment, the economy, the community, and your political
system. Instability in any of these four life-support systems
can cause suffering or death.

b. The Golden Rule 2.0. Once you have the Two Tables image in your mind, realize
that each of the eight legs is a life-support system. The
Golden Rule 2.0 is to put back into each of these eight
systems at least as much as what you take out. This new Golden
Rule is the spirit of the original Golden Rule, but it is a
higher standard. The Ecological
Lifestyle Assessment provides some idea of the many
actions that you can do. Most people who take the assessment
are surprised by the many ways they fail to live up to the
Golden Rule 2.0. They should not feel guilty about this.
Instead, they should realize that if it took years to develop
their current lifestyle habits, they should give themselves
years to change these habits
-- for instance, by changing one or
two habits every four months.
c. The
difference between temporary and structural changes in
systems. There is an easy way to understand how to have greater
impacts on your life-support systems. Imagine that you are in
a boat on a lake, and the boat has a slow leak. There are two
ways that you can keep from sinking. One way is to keep
bailing water, the other is to plug the leak. Bailing water
doesn't change the structure of the boat, but plugging the
leak does. All your life-support systems are similar to the
boat. For instance, if you have a close personal relationship
that is having major problems, you can try temporary fixes
(buying a present to make up for a fight, or going on a
vacation) but temporary fixes don't change the structure of
the relationship. A better approach is to figure out a
permanent strategy, by figuring out what's wrong and by either
learning a needed skill, such as active listening or conflict
resolution, or by instituting a regular process, such as
weekly writing a personal letter of your feelings to each
other, or weekly setting aside quality time to be together -- or something else, depending on what the
relationship needs. All other life-support systems are
similar: You can make temporary fixes, or permanent
structural changes.
The Sakai (also called The Sakai Vision)
Sakai is a Japanese word that means border, frontier or
boundary. We define The Sakai, using a capital S, to mean the
vision of a hundredfold reduction in the preventable suffering
and death on Earth, and the stabilization of our life-support
systems
-- including the economy, the environment, politics and our
communities.
a. Remember that the Sakai has two parts: First, to
diminish the preventable suffering and premature death a
hundredfold by the end of this century, and second, to
stabilize Earth's life-support systems such as the
environment, the economy and the political realm. (Stability
will help keep suffering near a minimum.)
b. Importance: As opposed to the utopian goal of
world peace, this is a goal that, though lofty, is measurable
and within the realm of possibility. Depending on what happens
in the future, it may not be possible to reach it in this
century. Regardless, having the vision will spark people to do
their level best. Commitment to the vision is also likely to
spark new ideas and methods. Aim high!
c. Is long-term stability really possible?
When talking about stabilizing the planet, it's important to
acknowledge that many experts believe that our population
already far exceeds what the Earth can support on a long-term
basis. So, realism is necessary. All adults
understand the meaning of "too late." For
those adults and children who will die today, it already is
too late. Stability might not be achieved in this
century, or it might require some severe adjustments to avoid
a great "die-off" as some experts predict. On
the other hand, a high quality of life depends more on a
person's inner life and personal relationships, and on
political freedom than on possessions, property or luxury, so
the adjustments that most people make be major, but on
balance, they may be more positive than negative, more
life-enhancing than life-damaging. So, rather than
fearing what you might lose, we encourage you to focus on the
lives you can save, by embracing the Sakai today.
World Peace One and World Peace One's global strategy to
attain the Sakai. (Superprograms, the $500 billion a year
strategy, and the Contest of Superprograms)
World Peace One is a tax-exempt, tax deductible nonprofit
organization begun in 1989. Its mission is to help people
examine their lives and make changes that improve the quality
of life for all. It was founded by Tim Cimino and friends. In
2007, the Group Genie division of World Peace One was formed
to generate more new ideas. Here are three new concepts:
a. Superprograms are multipurpose programs that include ongoing support,
capacity building (like lane two), and other strategies that
make self improvement and world improvement easier.
(Superprograms were defined on the Home Page.) The Fellowship of the Dream, Mission Ball, All
Around and Climb Today's Mountain are all superprograms. These
superprograms are ready to use, but they are serve as models
to inspire people to create other superprograms.
To encourage the creation of a wide variety
of other superprograms another part of our strategy is to
sponsor an annual contest between a
variety of organizations such as universities, corporations,
religious bodies, self-help authors, and nonprofits. They will
be able to design programs tailored to different cultures and
populations, and, the more this annual Contest of Superprograms is
promoted, the more these organizations will have marketing and
PR incentives to participate. For this reason, the Contest of
Superprograms is also called "The Greatest Contest on
Earth"
because of the great good that all the superprograms will
inspire.
b. The $500 billion a year strategy is for charities to
sponsor time and money management training for volunteers and
donors. The more the volunteers and donors save, the more they
will have for both themselves and their favorite charities. $500 billion
is the estimate of what the idea could add to the pool of
donations and volunteer hours worldwide. (While short
term trainings should be enough to boost time and money, we
expect that the ongoing support of a superprogram will
maintain the gains.) More.
"Hold the Pattern Together"
"Hold the pattern together" is a phrase that has
two meanings:
1. First, the Fellowship of the Dream had two parts that
must be held together: It should not be used by people who only
have personal goals, or
by people who only want to change the world. It's an integrated
program, and participants must make reasonable stretches in
both areas of the program. Naturally, people tend toward
self-interest, and many tend to put off other-centered
actions. But those who understand the Two Tables analogy
should realize that other-centered actions are equally
long-term insurance for your own welfare.
Practically speaking, this means that in the small groups and the
buddy contacts, all members should expect a balance of action
from all participants. While it may take months to activate
all eight lanes, from the very start participants should do some
actions on behalf of others. Only people in crisis have the
right to focus exclusively on themselves. If someone seems
interested only in themselves, you should withdraw your
support if they cannot be coaxed into action. In all
Fellowship contacts maintain the expectation that we are
working toward the Sakai, for the good of all
-- ourselves and
others.
2. The second meaning of "Hold the pattern
together" means to use all of the strategies together,
because they are much more powerful when used together. For
instance, the first two lanes of the Eight Lane Highway will
make action in the other lanes possible for
most people, even those who don't consider themselves
environmentalists or activists. Finally, the eighth lane of
passing on the program, makes the power of the program grow
huge very fast. For the sake of illustration, imagine that each
participant takes six months to get comfortable with the
program and then supports two people in the following six
months. At that rate, the program would cover the whole world in less than 25
years.
Then, imagine that each participant uses the support over the
next ten more to gradually make some major lifestyle changes. The result is that you have
a transformed world in 35 years!
Also, superprograms and the $500 billion idea can work
synergistically together. The $500 billion a year idea will
cause more food, medicine, computers and other resources to be
sent to developing nations, and superprograms will provide the
support and learning structures for people in these countries
to make the best use of these resources. Once again, the other
lanes of the Eight Lane Highway will produce greater
political, economic and environmental stability, also
contributing to the welfare of economically or politically
oppressed people worldwide.
Many of the strategies can be used separately and produce
some good. But avoid the temptation to make a quick splash.
Using the strategies separately is like grinding, cooking and
eating seeds. Using them together is like planting and tending
the seeds, and producing a hundred or a thousand times more
food -- in other words, a hundred or a thousand times more good.
"Make a friend. Be a friend. Lift a friend higher."
Power can be used for good and evil. The materials on this
web site can be used by dictators and other power-centered
people to increase their power over others. In fact, it is
almost inevitable that some people will be empowered to do
more harm. But there are two ways to minimize the damage. One
is to be as strategic as possible in empowering the weakest
and most oppressed, so that, on balance, good will increase
much more than evil. The second way to minimize
the damage is to do most of your empowerment of others through
personal relationships. This process is summed up in the
slogan "Make a friend. Be a friend. Lift a friend
higher."
Why empower through relationships? When you form a personal
relationship with someone, you'll get a good idea of what to
teach, how to teach it, and when. You'll also know what not to
teach, for instance techniques that they're not ready for. A second benefit of friendship is summarized in the
saying, "People don't care what you know, until they know
that you care." In other words, you can offer skills to
people, but sometimes they aren't motivated to learn and
change without personal support and caring. A third benefit is
the opportunity for mutual lifestyle transformation.
Friendship and relationship are not just a means of screening
people for the appropriate values. They are a way to express
your values in a way that speaks louder than words. Of course,
there's always the question of authenticity: Your goal cannot
be merely to influence alone.
The empowerment process is in three steps. Making a friend can
involve reaching out and talking to new people, but more often
than not it means talking with people you already know, but on
more than a superficial level. Being a friend involves active
listening. It also involves being of service—sometimes doing
for, sometimes doing with. The depth of service depends on how
well you listen to them to figure out what they need and
"really want." It also depends on your generosity.
Being a friend means loving them as they are, and loving the
vision they hold of themselves for their future.
Lifting a friend higher can mean inviting them to a healthier,
holier, or more holistic way of living. It can mean a gentle
invitation, or a direct confrontation. It can't be done if you
don't know who they are. It can't be done with someone who
doesn't know and trust you. And it can't be done if you're not
authentically living in a higher place. It can mean helping
them become conscious and clear on their vision, while at the
same time contributing what you can to make the vision greater
and clearer.
[This three-step method is actually adapted from a method
used in a Christian movement called Cursillo. The original
phrase is "Make a friend. Be a friend. Lead a friend to
Christ."]
"You do the quality control"
When Tim Cimino was designing this program he realized that he had
a choice. He could try to grow the program slowly, carefully
teaching people the vision one-to-one so that they would catch
the surgical attitude from him. Then the high standards
would be maintained in all of the Goal & Growth Groups and
in any Groupings of Groups. The problem with this approach is that
the program would grow and spread slowly, and it would take a
huge and expensive central organization to monitor all of the
groups. It's likely that a bureaucracy would develop, and it
would be unlikely that the central organization would respond
adequately and quickly enough to a variety of situations around the world.
The other alternative, the one Tim chose, was not to have
any formal quality control—in other words, to give each buddy pairing
and each group the responsibility to maintain the quality of
their own interactions, by trying to live up to the Surgeon's
Attitude.
In this way, the program can spread very quickly. For
instance, you might never have met anyone else in the program, and
yet you can still start a group by just using the resources on this
web site.
The problem with "you do the quality control" is that quality of
the groups will range from very good to very bad. For
instance, we can put materials on active listening on a web
site, but we can't force people to use active listening skills in
a support group. So
you might join a group of people who aren't good listeners. Or
you might join a group where someone is trying to control the
group. In this case, loyalty to the program and vision should
cause you to abandon an unhealthy group and find or start
another. You should also leave a good group if it's not
helping you. If you asked for a change and didn't get it, why
stay?
Of course, there's a danger that bad groups will give
the program a bad name. That's why it's up to good groups and
sincere members to continually learn skills and use feedback
from each other to improve themselves, and to actively recruit
participants, giving them a quality experience. Eventually it
will become common knowledge that there are no officially
sanctioned groups, and so new participants will know to stay
on their guard and exit unhealthy or unproductive situations.